Brain Mesh


 Hunt for

 "Saddam Hussein"

(circa 2002-2003)


In 2003, the mission was to find and capture

" WOLVERINE 1 "

Fact:

  A person's memory or perception(s) of events will always differ, degrade and scatter over time.

This was my Brain Mesh-Mod 12 (circa 2016), mostly made with 3D Printed parts. This version used dry connections, verses the old fashioned wet connections.  :)


    In 2003, the US mission was to find and capture

"Saddam Hussein"

who was known as " WOLVERINE I "

 codenamed: OPERATION RED DAWN,

 ( by: Army Captain Geoffrey McMurray )

~


     So in 2003, I developed a rudimentary hardware headset, which used a noninvasive technique to invoke and read a P3 response from very specific areas in the brain. The headset instantaneously and unbiasedly, delineate signals from within the brain and compares them to a person's verbal accounts or memories.  Basically I created a Visually Stimulated Recent Memory detector... 

Tech POC: 


    My algorithm was based on a "visual locust response". So when people wear the headset and are asked "Have you seen Saddam Hussein" or "Do you know where he is", they are then quickly flash an image of Saddam Hussein, as the headset quickly looks for very, very specific P3 responses within the subjects brain.


  Basically, like a locust response, when someone hears a question, they brain instantaneously starts to decode the questions and tries to "visualize" it.  So when you then quickly flashed an image of someone, their brain also instinctively tries to associated and connect to a recent "visual memory" (image).


   The headset instantly compares the responses to the question, "Have you seen Saddam Hussein?" to the flash of an image of Saddam Hussein. If the subject says either "Yes, I know where he is" or "No, I've never seen him," the headset can confirm their truth. Red led light for False answer, a Green led light for Truth.


   This subconscious and involuntary process involves neurons and neurological pathways which search stored "visual associated associations and memories" or creating a new visual associations in a different part of the brain, which is a key to my POC algorithmic headset.

Functionality

 

    So by flashing someone a picture/image, you'd either see a Green or Red light response on the headset. So if you saw a Green LED light illumination, then that person had not seen that person/image before or recently. But a Red LED illumination, would indicate that this person has had a very recently interaction or a very fresh memory or association.

  Standard Operating Procedure


     Unfortunately, the SOP - Standard Operating Procedures for the Military at the time was that they never touch or removing a turban or head wrap. This was forbidden, as it was a social or religious insult, which when you are trying to build trust, would defeat. So it made my Tech/headset impossible to use in the field (other than at Guantanamo or with an active combatant). :/ 

Government SOP


     Unfortunately, the Military and our Government used "conventionally" SOP to try to win locals "trust" and "respect", with billions of dollars given away to local "informants", elders, affiliations and others, to get information or intel, which the US Military desperately needed. 


  Regrettably, after analysis (data from 2002-2012) of all the expenditures, only about 00.984% of the Billions disbursed funds actually generated a positive/correct intel.  Apparently simply giving people money to purchase information is a severely flawed SOP of our Military and Government...




The pivot...

M.D.K   Headset

(Murder   Death   Kill )


    In 2007, O.J. Simpson ran from the police,

but eventually turned himself in and took a

 “polygraph” -lie detector test, which he 'Failed'.


    However, because a polygraph test results are

subjective to interpenetration" , as they are not fact and O.J.'s failed polygraph test results was not admissible in court.

        So I dusted of the POC headset and added more electrodes, incorporate a 360 augmented headset, eye motion tracker, and   change the algorithm to produce   a non-linear test would gain enough proprietorial quantitative data from the subject (Target/individual), it could extrapolate and then delineate a linear “yes” or “no” response (instantaneously)-to the "question" at hand.


     So now, when you asked someone, "Did you kill this person...," as a 360 degree crime scenes images was loaded into the   augmented headset, while the algorithm tracked their eye movements, monitoring their brain activity, and delineating in microseconds if what they are seeing (crime scene) is new and shocking, or a recent and familiar memory for them. The same application could be for rape victims, especially when the aggressor states they never new or saw that girl/boy...


    The simplicity or beauty of my my tech, is that it had absolutely nothing to do with someone's physical or mental ability to lie. Even under the influences of drug(s), meditation, or just being a habitual pathological liar, it is an instantaneous test, that no human could beat. It would work proficiently, ethical, reliability results, to produce quantitative testable result (just like DNA tests in the 90's), which eventually would become admissible, in a court of law.


Fast Forward to 2016...


  Unfortunately, after my strokes in July 2016, I obviously stopped working on her. So she now remains as an   a rare example of an unfinished POC and  personal endeavor.